arXiv preprint ·
Responsible Institutional Analytics: Interpreting Bias with AI Support
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Institutional Analytics (IA) dashboards inform decision-making in higher education, yet data limitations, constraints in analytical techniques, and missing contextual information often affect their interpretation. To support more responsible interpretation of IA, we introduce FACTRIA, a framework that organizes potential biasing factors across four areas: the analytics pipeline, institutional context, course-level characteristics, and demographics. We used the FACTRIA framework as input to a generative-AI chatbot designed to prompt users to reflect on these factors while analyzing IA. A qualitative study with stakeholders, drawing on four authentic IA cases, and a transition network analysis showed that the chatbot prompted participants to recognize how overlooked factors influenced their initial interpretation. Findings indicated that combining a structured framework with AI-based guidance can enhance context-aware, responsible interpretation of institutional data.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
Graph Data Augmentation via Contrastive Generator Inversion ($\texttt{DCBA}$)
Disentangling Models from Personas in Heterogeneous LLM Simulations
FairProp: Fair Node Representation Learning via Differentiable Propagation Layers
Benchmarking System One Models in Online Moderation
Learning to Simulate Individuals from Macro Social Signals
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.