arXiv preprint ·
SPEAR: Five Principles for Interactive Human-Agent Alignment
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Recent AI alignment work often frames alignment as a pre-deployment optimization problem: collect human feedback, learn preferences or principles, finetune the model, and deploy an aligned system. This framing has produced major progress, but it under-specifies what happens once AI systems act as agents on users' behalf in situated, long-term, and social contexts. This position paper reframes human-agent alignment as an ongoing interaction design problem. We propose SPEAR, five pillars of interactive alignment: Specification (how people express intent and establish shared understanding), Process (how agents decide when to act, ask, defer, or pause), Evaluation (how people judge whether agents succeeded), Adaptation (how agents adapt to users over repeated use), and Recalibration (how people adapt their trust, expectations, and behavior in response to agents).
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
Can CaMeLs Talk? Securing Multi-Agent Systems Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks
Disentangling Models from Personas in Heterogeneous LLM Simulations
Scalar Communication via Random Direction Refreshing for Distributed Optimization
Where Rules End and Judges Begin: Measuring the Judgment Boundary in Multi-Agent Systems Security
Square-Root Regret for Adversarial Multiplayer Bandits without Collision Information or Shared Randomness
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.