arXiv preprint ·

Towards semantic reconstruction of individual words from fnirs using clip loss

Santiago Posso-Murillo, Nathan Palladino, Ben Pyykkonen, Dan Y. Han, Luis G. Sanchez-Giraldo and Jihye Bae

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

Semantic reconstruction maps neural activity to a word-embedding space, recovering the meaning of a perceived word instead of selecting it from a fixed vocabulary. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) carries semantic information suitable for this mapping. However, most fNIRS decoders are trained with a squared-error objective that fits each word independently and ignores the geometry of the embedding space. To address this limitation, we evaluate a contrastive loss based on the contrastive-language-image-pretraining (CLIP) loss, as an alternative to mean-squared-error (MSE) for reconstructing perceived words from fNIRS. We compare the two objectives by training a bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) decoder to map fNIRS signals to word embeddings. We use GloVe-50 and T5 word embeddings as targets, across three fNIRS datasets recorded under a shared paradigm pairing each word image with its spoken name. Performance is measured with a pairwise matching score and open-vocabulary top-$k$ retrieval. The Bi-LSTM trained with CLIP is the most consistent decoder across experiments. T5 produces higher matching scores, whereas every significant retrieval result uses GloVe-50. These results support the use of contrastive objectives as a promising direction for fNIRS semantic decoding and motivate validation on larger datasets.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Human-Computer Interaction

Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics