arXiv preprint ·
Trust-Gated Capability Control: Breaking the Trust-Vulnerability Paradox in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Layered trust models for multi-agent LLM systems remain largely conceptual: they name which dimensions of trust matter but not how layers combine, how their importance is set at runtime, or how trust should govern agent actions. This gap matters because higher inter-agent trust raises task success while also enlarging exposure to exploitation, a tension formalized as the Trust-Vulnerability Paradox. We make a five-layer trust stack operational through three contributions. First, a cross-layer synergy operator propagates prerequisite-layer deficits into de- pendent layers, feeding a generalized-mean composite trust that recovers the weakest-link rule as a limiting case, with provable bounds. Second, per-layer importance weights are grounded in observed failures via a no-regret online estimator that tracks which layer is currently most responsible for harm. Third, Trust- Gated Capability Control issues short-lived, revocable capability grants only when composite trust and the relevant prerequisite layers clear capability-specific thresholds. We prove this mechanism breaks the paradox: a stealthy compromise that inflates behavioral trust while degrading a prerequisite layer cannot escalate privilege, and give a closed-form, provably conservative trust fixed point with a bounded-latency revocation guarantee. A numerical study with a sleeper adversary confirms the predictions: composite-trust bounds hold across 20,000 random draws, the analytic fixed point matches simulation within 0.007, and a compromised prerequisite layer triggers automatic revocation within a few interactions.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Science & Game Theory
On prediction from expert advice with more than five experts
Priority Coordination Games: Hodge Decomposition and a Sharp Design Limit
Settling the Computational Complexity of Max-Min Allocation with Ternary Valuations
Incentive Alignment in Online Experimentation
Learning in Continuous Games from Pairwise Preference Feedback
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Science & Game Theory every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.