arXiv preprint ·
Priority Coordination Games: Hodge Decomposition and a Sharp Design Limit
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
In decentralised priority coordination, agents announce priority levels and a shared resource serves them in decreasing order, as at an unsignalised intersection; the levels form the decision layer of a hierarchical controller. Such interactions are routinely replaced by a potential game, i.e.\ by a common objective, for analysis and design. This paper determines what that surrogate misses, using the Hodge decomposition of the incentives into a potential component, which a common objective can represent, and a harmonic component, which it cannot. For the linear payoff, both components are obtained in closed form on every conflict graph and for every deterministic tie-breaking protocol: in common units, the harmonic energy is the number of conflicts and the potential energy adds the number of adjacent pairs of conflicts. Consequently, for every rationality parameter, the best common-objective model of the agents' choice log-odds, weighted uniformly over unilateral moves, has a relative squared error of at least $1/(d_{\max}+1)$, where $d_{\max}$ is the largest number of conflicts of one agent; for an eight-vehicle intersection it is exactly one fifth, for any number of priority levels. Invisible to strict-improvement dynamics, the missed component is, under low-rationality log-linear learning with uniform revision and to leading order, the stationary probability current, and its energy sets the entropy-production rate. Payoff design cannot remove it: on the complete conflict graph of $N$ agents, under a total-order protocol and with at least three priority levels, every nonconstant rank-based payoff leaves a relative error of at least $1/N$, with equality exactly for affine payoffs.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Science & Game Theory
Explicit Asymptotic Bounds for Sequential Calibration Beyond $T^{2/3}$
Incentive Alignment in Online Experimentation
Stochastic Gradient Descent Ascent is Suboptimal for Nonconvex-PL Min-Max Games
Fast Last-Iterate Convergence in Zero-Sum Markov Games with Bandit Feedback
Network Intervention by Polling Strategic Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Science & Game Theory every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.