arXiv preprint ·

Repair Lot Skyline: A Weighted Constraint Satisfaction Approach to Pavement Repair Optimization from Geospatial Hazard Density

Takato Yasuno, Keita Kobayashi, Ryuta Sakaguchi and Takuya Okamoto

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Machine Learning

Abstract

Pavement agencies must translate a spatially distributed distress inventory into a bounded, actionable repair-lot plan: accident-critical defects (potholes) must always be addressed, lower-risk defects (cracks) should be included only when their benefit justifies the repair cost, and historical patch locations signal re-degradation risk without themselves triggering repair. We formalize this as a Repair Lot Skyline problem: a Weighted Constraint Satisfaction Problem (WCSP) defined over chainage (distance along the road) rather than over time, so that it requires only a single-epoch distress survey and makes no claim about future deterioration. The WCSP identifies 143 candidate hazard clusters (61 hard, 82 soft), of which 106 are merged into a final repair plan totaling 1,997.4 m---83.7% of the 2,385.9 m that would be required if every soft candidate were included regardless of cost. This plan covers 100% of observed potholes (138/138) and 91.6% of observed cracks (404/441), capturing 93.6% (542/579) of the total hazard benefit available in the full candidate set. The skyline frontier shows pronounced diminishing returns beyond this point: the remaining 37 excluded soft candidates would add only 6.8% additional benefit for a 19.4% increase in repair length. We further formalize the minimum-lot-length $L_{\min}$ and historical-context radius $κ$ as a joint, four-objective hyperparameter search over this WCSP; on the same case study, the recommended configuration ($L_{\min} = 14.7$ m, $κ= 10$ m) reduces repair-crew mobilizations by 7.1% relative to an untuned default, at the cost of a 12.9% larger budget and a 1.1-percentage-point lower crack coverage.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Machine Learning

Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics