arXiv preprint ·
Which Preferences to Train On? End-to-End Multi-Objective Alignment with an Adversarial Preference Distribution
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values is important for safe, efficient, and beneficial AI deployment. However, human values are multifaceted: helpfulness, harmlessness and humor trade off against one another, and different users want different trade-offs. Multi-objective alignment (MOA) addresses this by training a policy that can provide any point of the Pareto front, but existing methods either train one model per preference, interpolate a few separately aligned experts post hoc, or train a single conditioned model without considering which preferences it should be trained on. Since the hard regions of the preference simplex depend on the objectives at hand, existing methods leave them under-trained and do not get the most out of a single model. Therefore, we propose MAESTRO (Multi-objective Alignment via End-to-end STeering and Robust Optimization), which formulates MOA as a minimax problem over preference distributions and trains a single prompt-conditioned policy end-to-end with RL against an adversarial preference distribution: a Dirichlet distribution updated by online mirror descent toward the preferences the current policy serves worst, rather than on a fixed one. On HH-RLHF, BeaverTails and a summarization task, with up to three objectives, MAESTRO attains the best Pareto front on most tasks in a single training run, at the lowest training cost among the compared methods. The largest margins appear in the hard regions that a fixed preference distribution leaves under-trained, confirming that a single prompt-conditioned model is capable of covering the objective trade-offs on its own.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
GRAM: Correcting Frozen Time-Series Foundation Models via Graph-Retrieved Amplitude Memory
Visual Grounding Safety in Vision-Language Models
Spacecraft Rendezvous Trajectory Generation with Modular Constraints via Diffusion Model Composition
PIT-GCL: Protein Interaction using Topological Graph Contrastive Learning
When Does a Diffusion Model Decide What to Draw ?
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.