arXiv preprint ·

AICoFe Demo: AI-based Collaborative Feedback System

Alvaro Becerra, Alejandra Palma, Ruth Cobos and Julian Fierrez

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
DOI
10.1007/978-3-032-37982-5_45
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

Peer feedback promotes active learning, critical reflection, and skill development, but its effectiveness is often limited by the quality of feedback students provide. Recent advances in LLMs offer new opportunities to support peer feedback by generating more coherent and actionable feedback while preserving human oversight. This paper presents AICoFe, an AI-based collaborative feedback system designed to support teacher, peer, and self-assessment in higher education. AICoFe integrates rubric-based evaluations, GenAI-supported feedback, Learning Analytics dashboards, and video recordings to foster reflective learning. The system combines quantitative scores and qualitative observations to generate structured feedback focused on strengths, areas for improvement, and actionable recommendations, which teachers can review and curate. An evaluation with 65 undergraduate and master's students shows high satisfaction with the coherence and usefulness of the feedback, as well as the excellent usability, indicating that AICoFe effectively supports peer feedback in authentic educational settings.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Human-Computer Interaction

Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics