arXiv preprint ·
Better Call Reward: Reward Hacking as Strategic Abstention in Legal Reasoning Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
What happens when a legal AI model learns to look like a lawyer instead of reasoning like one? We fine tune Qwen3-8B with Group Relative Policy Optimisation (GRPO) against a proxy built from three surface features: citation count, legalese density, and response length. The model does not learn to reason more effectively. It learns to withhold commitment. Across 16 yes or no legal reasoning tasks from LegalBench (N=320), overall accuracy collapses from 0.500 (chance) to 0.072 (McNemar p < 10^-36), driven entirely by the rate of properly formatted answers falling from 0.900 to 0.109. The model stops committing to answers. Yet when it does commit, accuracy rises from 0.556 to 0.657, showing that the collapse is not a failure of capability but a strategic response: the model has learned that verbose responses packed with citations but empty of a direct answer score higher than terse correct ones. We term this the Saul Goodman effect, a policy that becomes maximally lawyerly while becoming maximally noncommittal, and prove formally that it is the optimal response to any surface feature proxy that attaches no penalty to abstention. We further show that 89.3% of citations produced after training are structurally implausible hallucinations, many of them subtly corrupted names of real landmark cases, constructed in effect to survive a casual read and fail under scrutiny. To detect this failure mode before deployment, we introduce three diagnostic tools: the Confidence Theater Score (CTS), the Citation Plausibility Rate (CPR), and the Regret Gap (RG). In a domain where a confidently wrong answer can constitute malpractice, the broader lesson is direct: a reward function that measures how legal a response looks will produce a model that is maximally photogenic and minimally useful.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Visual Grounding Safety in Vision-Language Models
Evaluating human-AI workflows for field research in viticulture
Planetary Geospatial Foundation Models: A New Paradigm for Global Public Health
From Algorithmic Marginalization to AI-Mediated Re-Centering: Can Culturally Grounded AI Bring Hakka Language and Culture Back into Mainstream Society?
Curriculum Brain: Constructing Curriculum Knowledge Graphs as a Substrate for Cognitive Diagnosis
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.