arXiv preprint ·
What Did the AI Take On? Characterizing Cognitive Delegation in LLM Reasoning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) often perform intermediate cognitive work while carrying out users' requests, yet it remains unclear which parts users intended to delegate and how they wanted to remain involved. This matters because consequential choices may go unnoticed, limiting users' ability to steer the process, while reviewing every step would make delegation burdensome. We examined this with 24 LLM users across three knowledge-work tasks, collecting 992 retrospective annotations of reasoning steps. From this, we developed taxonomies of LLM cognitive work, delegation enactment, and desired delegation protocols at the reasoning-step level. Our analysis revealed that participants viewed about half of all steps (48.6%) as AI-initiated, meaning the AI took on work they had not requested. Desired involvement varied with cognitive work and delegation enactment, even when contributions matched participants' intent. We propose design implications and sketches for supporting more deliberate cognitive delegation through flexible protocols and inspectable, revisable AI-initiated decisions.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
End-to-End Safe Social Navigation via Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning and Probabilistic Perception
Emoception: Selective Affective Layer Fine-Tuning of Video Vision Transformers for Player Arousal Change Recognition From Gameplay Footage
Smart Navigation for Visual Prostheses in Virtual Reality: An End-to-End Framework for Priority-Based Scene Translation and Path Guidance
Beyond screen time: Explaining cross-national differences in digital literacy through socioeconomic and psychological mechanisms
Supporting Couples' Social Well-being in Daily Life: A Needs Assessment and Co-design with Co-located Couples
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.