arXiv preprint ·
AI-Generated Disinformation in the UK: Risk of Harm, Context, and Classification
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
More people across the UK are today exposed to more AI-generated and AI-altered disinformation and misinformation than ever before - exposing individuals and society to a growing range of harmful consequences and potential consequences. We analyse evidence from a dataset of 112 pieces of AI-generated or AI-altered disinformation or misinformation seen tens of millions of times across the UK between 1 January 2025 and 31 March 2026. The dataset of examples studied does not, of course, provide an exhaustive sample of all AI-generated false information in circulation in the period, but rather a snapshot of examples showing some, but not all, of the potential effects. Our analysis of this sample found a substantive risk of causing or contributing to harm to individuals and society in eight distinct fields, from contributing to incidents of serious social unrest and vigilante violence to causing direct harms to health and causing the sort of serious financial loss that can be caused by online scams and fraud. Other fields of risk included: abuse serious enough to affect individuals' health and behaviour; public engagement with the police and justice systems; susceptibility to false conspiracy theories with the potential to cause direct harms; and broader changes to social and political attitudes with potential to affect political, social events over the longer term. More than four in five pieces of content we assessed added to reasons for the public to distrust information as not merely inaccurate but substantively false or misleading: a broad disinformation effect with potential for significant effects for society.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
Visual Grounding Safety in Vision-Language Models
Evaluating human-AI workflows for field research in viticulture
Planetary Geospatial Foundation Models: A New Paradigm for Global Public Health
From Algorithmic Marginalization to AI-Mediated Re-Centering: Can Culturally Grounded AI Bring Hakka Language and Culture Back into Mainstream Society?
Curriculum Brain: Constructing Curriculum Knowledge Graphs as a Substrate for Cognitive Diagnosis
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.