arXiv preprint ·
Constraint-Aware Conversational Job Recommendation in Code-Mixed Low-Resource Settings
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Conversational job recommendation requires jointly modeling semantic relevance, user preferences, eligibility requirements, and the noisy language used in real-world career discussions. These challenges are especially pronounced in low-resource, code-mixed settings, where strict constraint matching can incorrectly eliminate otherwise suitable jobs. We introduce JobCCC, a conversational job recommendation benchmark for Bangladesh comprising 22,410 structured job postings and 988 multi-turn career-advice dialogues derived from regional Reddit communities. Each dialogue is annotated with evolving seeker preferences and linked to a ground-truth job, and is evaluated in semantically equivalent English and Romanized Bangla--English variants. We compare sparse BM25 retrieval, multilingual dense retrieval, and their hard-constraint-filtered counterparts against Weighted Soft-Constraint-Aware Ranking (W-SCAR), our multi-criteria ranking framework that combines lexical relevance, semantic relevance, and graded utilities for experience, location, education, and salary using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Experiments reveal that strict filtering consistently degrades retrieval because incomplete extraction and brittle attribute matching irreversibly remove relevant jobs. W-SCAR avoids destructive pruning and achieves more balanced performance across the two language conditions, obtaining 37.37% and 38.43% Hit@10 on English and Banglish, respectively. The code and dataset are publicly available at \href{https://github.com/M-Jawad01/Conversational-Job-Recommendation-System-LLM}{GitHub} and \href{https://huggingface.co/datasets/Armans33115/JobCCC-Conversational-Job-Recommendation-Bangladesh}{Hugging Face}, respectively.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Retrieval
Generate What You Can Trust: Content Credibility in Generative Recommenders
DBRAG: Multi-Table Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Complex Database Queries
Errors of LLM-Assisted Literature Retrieval in Environmental Science: A Comparison Study of Abstract versus Full-text Based Prompts
Learning to Retrieve via Reinforcement Learning in Embedding Space
PACMI: Provenance-Aware Cascading Memory Invalidation for Long-Term LLM Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.