arXiv preprint ·
Generate What You Can Trust: Content Credibility in Generative Recommenders
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP)
- DOI
- 10.18653/2026.findings-emnlp.2252
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
Abstract
Generative recommendation (GR) represents items with semantic IDs (i.e., discrete token sequences) and generates target item tokens as recommendations. Despite its promising results, existing methods predominantly optimize for accuracy while neglecting the credibility of the recommendations they generate. This oversight inevitably exposes users to uncredible content (e.g., fake news) with serious societal consequences, including user distrust, reputation harm to platforms, and broader social instability. To address this critical yet underexplored challenge, we propose CreGR, the first credible GR model that jointly tackles content credibility across the two core stages of GR: tokenization and generation. In the tokenization stage, we design a new credibility-aware tokenizer that explicitly encourages the model to learn discriminative tokens respectively for credible and uncredible items, thereby disentangling credibility signals at the token level. Building on this, in the generation stage, we propose a novel accuracy-preserving and credibility-oriented generator grounded in discrete diffusion. Specifically, we introduce an asymmetric masking probability reduction strategy that selectively diminishes the contribution of tokens associated with uncredible content to the generation process, while leaving tokens encoding user preference signals unaffected so as to preserve recommendation accuracy. Experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of CreGR.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Retrieval
DBRAG: Multi-Table Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Complex Database Queries
Errors of LLM-Assisted Literature Retrieval in Environmental Science: A Comparison Study of Abstract versus Full-text Based Prompts
Learning to Retrieve via Reinforcement Learning in Embedding Space
PACMI: Provenance-Aware Cascading Memory Invalidation for Long-Term LLM Agents
Token-Budgeted Escalation for Financial Document QA: Cost Is Predictable, Benefit Is the Bottleneck
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.