arXiv preprint ·
When Low Prediction Error Misleads Planning: Diagnosing Representation, Dynamics, and Decision Failures in Latent World Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The component that dominates a latent world model's prediction error need not be the one whose repair most improves action selection. We show this by comparing action sequences from identical physical starts and separating endpoint error into a candidate-pool center and action-relative responses. Across four model families and four tasks, a confirmation pool of 256 new starts per task and 300 shared candidates per start shows that center error dominates MSE in 14/16 model-task cells. Yet in six of these cells, an oracle that corrects only the action-relative responses yields better physical rank correlation and top-30 elite quality than one that corrects only the center, while leaving more latent MSE (family-wise corrected intervals). The preference differs across the evaluated settings: a separate LeWorldModel (LeWM) study that executes oracle-selected actions favors center repair on PushT and on Reacher with a render-matched goal. Matched-candidate tests localize ordering loss: for LeWM, encoding realized endpoints raises physical Spearman from 0.464 to 0.975 on that Reacher setting and from 0.193 to 0.631 on PushT (64 starts per task), while Cube's encoded-goal cost remains uninformative. A 72-run objective study improves selected response diagnostics, while incremental closed-loop planning gains remain unconfirmed. These results separate error magnitude from the decision effects of oracle correction and motivate evaluating representation, prediction, and planning as separate stages.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
GRAM: Correcting Frozen Time-Series Foundation Models via Graph-Retrieved Amplitude Memory
Visual Grounding Safety in Vision-Language Models
Which Preferences to Train On? End-to-End Multi-Objective Alignment with an Adversarial Preference Distribution
Spacecraft Rendezvous Trajectory Generation with Modular Constraints via Diffusion Model Composition
PIT-GCL: Protein Interaction using Topological Graph Contrastive Learning
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.