arXiv preprint ·
Human-Like Attention? A Psychophysical Comparison of Visual Search in Humans and MLLMs
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- DOI
- 10.1007/s42113-026-00333-4
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Visual search is a fundamental cognitive ability. This study investigates whether Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) exhibit human-like difficulty signatures in visual search tasks. We compared search performance of humans (n = 1,250) and MLLMs using identical 2D and 3D stimuli across different set sizes. Both groups showed efficient performance in feature searches, most clearly when the target had a unique color, but performance degradation in conjunction searches as set sizes increased. Additionally, we found strong correlations between human and MLLM error rates ($ρ= 0.82$), which suggests that MLLMs are sensitive to similar objective complexities, such as stimulus heterogeneity. However, differences were found as well: whereas humans invested extra search time to respond accurately on target-absent trials, MLLMs exhibited extreme present/absent response biases in complex searches. We conclude that MLLMs replicate high-level human performance signatures, yet their underlying computations differ significantly.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
Bounded Reasoning: Cognitive Hierarchy in Human-versus-AI Cyber Defense
End-to-End Safe Social Navigation via Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning and Probabilistic Perception
Proactive AI: From Turns to Replannable Dialogue Timelines
Smart Navigation for Visual Prostheses in Virtual Reality: An End-to-End Framework for Priority-Based Scene Translation and Path Guidance
Preference vs. Performance: EEG-Based Classification of Learner Engagement in Multimodal Instruction
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.