arXiv preprint ·
Search Engines Never Say No: How Frozen Agents React When the Retrieval Tool Refuses
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A search tool never says no: it returns its top-k passages even when the index holds no answer, so the agent sees irrelevant text instead of a miss signal. We ask what frozen search agents do when the tool refuses instead. On an index-hole testbed (257 NQ and 300 HotpotQA questions run with and without their gold passages in a 21M-passage BM25 index), seven agents receive one of five refusal wordings. An un-announced one-sentence refusal raises abstention on unanswerable questions from 23% to 97% on average for Qwen3-8B/32B and from 28% to 57% for Claude Haiku 4.5, cutting wrong answers almost one-for-one and beating a system-prompt instruction by 51 points on average. Search-R1 ignores the refusal and fabricates retrievals; Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5 answer from memory (abstention +2 points) and obey a system-prompt directive instead (+16). We also found that wording matters: an explanation beats a bare token; a directive inside the observation is decisive for Haiku; a soft warning is useless. Realistic triggers, from a lightweight score-based predictor to an LLM grounding judge, fall well short of the oracle, and all land on a benefit-versus-signal-quality curve that prices any trigger by its recall at a fixed false-refusal budget: for compliant agents the bottleneck is the detector inside the tool, not the agent, and the curve tells future detector work what each point of recall is worth.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Retrieval
ModelLakeFishing: Efficient Retrieval over Million-Scale Model Lakes
Generate What You Can Trust: Content Credibility in Generative Recommenders
Do We Still Need Gazetteers in the Era of LLMs? Chaining Retrieval with a Spatial Neuro-Symbolic Index
Errors of LLM-Assisted Literature Retrieval in Environmental Science: A Comparison Study of Abstract versus Full-text Based Prompts
Agentic RAG Evaluation: Budget Allocation Across Questions, Trajectories, and Reads
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.