arXiv preprint ·
What Will Post-Training Fix? Per-Problem Gains Are Shared Across Independent RL Runs, and Existing Checkpoints Predict Them Better Than A Priori Signals
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Data selection, curricula and the evaluation of post-training recipes all assume that we can tell, before training, which problems a model will improve on. We test this assumption directly. For two base models, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B and Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B, we evaluate eighteen post-training runs on up to 1532 competition math problems with many samples per problem, and compare signals available before training against a noise ceiling derived from the agreement between disjoint subsets of runs. Three findings hold on both base models. What post-training fixes is shared: independent runs agree on which rarely solved problems improve, with a noise ceiling of about 0.9, yet the two base models agree with each other only at rho=0.25 - the shared component belongs to the base model, not to the problem. A priori signals capture a minority of it: base pass rate, the likelihood of a correct solution, a larger model's pass rate and their combinations explain only 0.30 and 0.24 of the explainable variance in gains. Existing checkpoints are the better predictor: the per-problem gains of a single checkpoint from another family predict a new run better than every a priori signal, alone or combined (0.52 vs. 0.33 and 0.34 vs. 0.17 against the combined signals). The conclusions hold on problems from 2025-2026 competitions and when the baselines on the two sides of every comparison are estimated independently. We propose the noise ceiling as a standard companion to per-problem signals.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
GRAM: Correcting Frozen Time-Series Foundation Models via Graph-Retrieved Amplitude Memory
Visual Grounding Safety in Vision-Language Models
Which Preferences to Train On? End-to-End Multi-Objective Alignment with an Adversarial Preference Distribution
Spacecraft Rendezvous Trajectory Generation with Modular Constraints via Diffusion Model Composition
PIT-GCL: Protein Interaction using Topological Graph Contrastive Learning
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.