arXiv preprint ·
Prompt Dominance and Asymmetric Verifier Costs: Empirical Ablations of GRPO at 1B Scale on GSM8K
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
This paper studies GRPO at 1B scale from both directions: what estimator choices do to the learning signal, and what a degraded reward signal does to what is learned. We train OLMo-2-0425-1B on GSM8K with a from-scratch implementation and measure both sides in controlled sweeps, including a verifier-quality experiment that degrades the training reward and the test-time selector identically. Four results stand out. The prompt is the first-order decision: the zero-shot prompt leaves the base model at 0.08% (its outputs are degenerate continuations, not wrong answers), so almost no group carries a gradient, and training succeeds because the 3-shot prompt reaches 18.3%. At this scale the estimator variants sit within seed noise, with Dr. GRPO ahead on both seeds. In the off-policy regime, clipping is the whole story: training on data without a clipped ratio loses 4-6 points relative to the on-policy reference, while GRPO-style clipping and GSPO recover the loss entirely. Finally, the same weak verifier is far cheaper in RL than in test-time selection: a 10%-flip verifier leaves RL's attainable gain intact (91% and 106% retained across two seeds) where selection retains 57%, and a format-only verifier leaves RL with 16-30% of its gain and selection with essentially nothing. Flip noise acts as an affine transform on the expected reward, and the group-normalized advantage with Adam's rescaling removes it exactly; the residual is a second-order variance effect that the matched-step comparison at a 30% flip rate tests.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
GRAM: Correcting Frozen Time-Series Foundation Models via Graph-Retrieved Amplitude Memory
Visual Grounding Safety in Vision-Language Models
Which Preferences to Train On? End-to-End Multi-Objective Alignment with an Adversarial Preference Distribution
Spacecraft Rendezvous Trajectory Generation with Modular Constraints via Diffusion Model Composition
PIT-GCL: Protein Interaction using Topological Graph Contrastive Learning
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.