arXiv preprint ·
Repeated-Measure Leakage, Distribution Shift, and Reliability under Partial Observation in Patient World Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Patient world models are increasingly proposed for longitudinal prediction, intervention-aware reasoning, and clinical-trial simulation. Causal or clinical intervention validity is distinct from predictive generalization and reliability; before making stronger claims, the underlying predictive state should generalize across patients, survive realistic shifts and missing observations, and expose failure through meaningful reliability signals. We evaluate these prerequisites in a deliberately narrow setting: short-horizon digital-biomarker forecasting from PhysioNet GaitPDB, comprising 165 participants, 306 recordings, and 51,129 context-future pairs. Using persistence, ridge, MLP, GRU, Transformer, and a compact JEPA-style predictor, we build an evaluation ladder that progressively removes raw temporal overlap, same-recording familiarity, and same-patient familiarity before testing unseen-patient generalization. For GRU, NMSE rises from 0.1227 under random-window splitting to 0.1393 after eliminating raw train-test overlap and to 0.1961 under patient holdout. Among 54 participants with repeated recordings, exposure to a different recording from the same patient improves GRU NMSE from 0.2177 to 0.1556, while a recording-excluded identity hypothesis is not supported at the participant level. Under participant-held-out evaluation, MLP and Transformer are statistically indistinguishable. Study shift, a four-times-longer prediction gap, and partial observation further degrade performance; under 50% temporal masking, Transformer NMSE rises to 0.611 while MC-dropout predictive variance falls. We do not claim a longitudinal or intervention-aware simulator. Instead, the results support a prerequisite evaluation stack of patient separation, repeated-measure controls, shift, missingness, and uncertainty validation before stronger patient-world-model claims are trusted.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Mitigating Over-squashing without Rewiring: A Sheaf Effective Resistance Perspective
GRAM: Correcting Frozen Time-Series Foundation Models via Graph-Retrieved Amplitude Memory
How RL Reshapes LLM Reasoning: Transferability, Coverage, and Scaling Laws
Which Preferences to Train On? End-to-End Multi-Objective Alignment with an Adversarial Preference Distribution
Principled Top-$k$ Selection for Language Models with Hybrid Gradients
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.