arXiv preprint ·
Trends in EHR Satisfaction and Interoperability Among Family Physicians: A Five-Year Analysis of the ABFM Continuous Certification Questionnaire, 2022-2026
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
To assess trends in family physicians' (FPs) electronic health record (EHR) satisfaction and their experience of interoperability across organizations. Materials and Methods: Serial cross-sectional analysis of five waves of the American Board of Family Medicine's Continuous Certification Questionnaire (2022-26). Adjusted logistic regression compared odds of being very satisfied across 11 EHRs; Cochran-Armitage tests assessed vendor trends. Ease of using outside information was analyzed separately for same- and different-vendor sources. Results: Across 36,785 FPs, adjusted odds of being very satisfied relative to Epic ranged from 0.91 (95% CI, 0.74-1.11) for Elation Health to 0.17 (95% CI, 0.15-0.20) for Oracle Health/Cerner. Only Epic's users became significantly more satisfied (Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted P < .001), widening the vendor satisfaction gap. Within comparable periods, ease of using different-vendor information did not improve; fewer than 13% rated it very easy. Epic's interoperability advantage reversed by exchange type: non-Epic users had less than half the odds of Epic users of rating same-vendor interoperability very easy (adjusted OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.38-0.44) but 1.54 times the odds for different-vendor interoperability (95% CI, 1.35-1.75). Discussion and Conclusion: The ABFM data are already informing EHR policy effects but they also have utility for the EHR marketplace. EHR satisfaction differences are widening, and reported ease of using different-vendor information is low and unchanged. While EHR satisfaction has known implications for burden and burnout, interoperability is a quality and safety threat that may be compounded by artificial intelligence.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
DimSteer: Steering LLM Authoring with Automatically Discovered Stylistic Controls
Bounded Reasoning: Cognitive Hierarchy in Human-versus-AI Cyber Defense
Evaluating Just Noticeable Differences in Layered Opacity Visualizations
Proactive AI: From Turns to Replannable Dialogue Timelines
Benchmarking Psychological Dynamics in Generative Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.