arXiv preprint ·
When a Correct Reward Is Not Enough: Diagnosing and Guiding PPO in an Analytically Solved Broker-Trader Game
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) is increasingly used for financial optimal-control problems when complex dynamics make analytical strategies difficult to obtain. There are financial mathematics literactures which provides many solved models whose equations and controls could evaluate and guide learning; we ask whether RL can exploit these results. We place a proximal policy optimisation (PPO) agent in an analytically solved continuous-time broker--trader game. PPO replaces the broker and chooses its trading speed while interacting with an informed trader and stochastic uninformed order flow. We derive a finite-step reward from the broker's continuous-time payoff and verify its discrete implementation through grid refinement and an exact one-step identity. With zero uninformed flow, a validation-selected PPO--FFNN approaches the reference action. With stochastic uninformed flow, the tested PPO--FFNN and PPO--LSTM remain inaccurate, although supervised learning confirms that their actors can represent the action. Monte Carlo diagnostics show that their critics do not reliably rank nearby actions; potential-based reward shaping also gives no reliable improvement. Under partial information, a causal certainty-equivalent controller based on the broker's observable history remains close to the reference, while PPO has larger errors and lower payoffs. Finally, we freeze the analytical policy and train PPO to adjust it after the execution cost changes. Halving the cost yields a repeatable improvement that closes \(2.22\%\) of the gap to the changed-cost reference. The analytical solution therefore provides both a benchmark for diagnosing RL and a useful starting policy for adaptation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Trading & Market Microstructure
Axient: Canonical Protocol-Graph Composition for Leveraged Event Markets: Single State Authority, Atomic Composition, Durable Sagas, and Exactly-Once Recovery
Buying at Support: The Entry Problem under Multi-Skew Brownian Motion
Axient: Manifest-Bound Evidence for On-Chain Financial Protocols: Seven-Layer Derivation, Correlation, Tamper Rejection, and Reproducible Claim Promotion
Latent Continuum of Regimes in Limit Order Book Dynamics
MintEval: Do LLMs Implement the Trading Strategy You Asked For? A Behavioural-Equivalence Benchmark for Natural-Language-to-Strategy Code
Get the few papers worth your time in Trading & Market Microstructure every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.