arXiv preprint ·
MintEval: Do LLMs Implement the Trading Strategy You Asked For? A Behavioural-Equivalence Benchmark for Natural-Language-to-Strategy Code
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models are moving from producing trading signals to writing the code that executes them. The failure mode of the second role is silent: generated code runs, a backtest plots, yet the risk logic that the trader described is not the logic being executed. Existing code benchmarks test functional correctness on unit tests and finance benchmarks test forecasting; neither measures whether an implementation behaves like the strategy that was asked for. We introduce MintEval, a benchmark in which reference strategies are generated programmatically from a library of composable building blocks, back-translated into colloquial trader instructions, and re-implemented by the model under test. Generated and reference programs are executed bar by bar on identical market data and frictions, and compared on their actions rather than on code similarity or profit: alpha is differenced away. MintEval v0 contains 800 tasks on BTCUSDT 15-minute data, stratified by an execution-measured state-span complexity tau that is decoupled from description length. Low-cost models reach a mean ActionMatch of at most 0.544 and reproduce at most 0.087 of tasks exactly; on a stratified subset of 200 tasks a frontier model (Claude Opus 5.5) reaches 0.889 and reproduces 0.575 exactly, yet still fails silently on 0.275 of tasks. Given a menu of building blocks, models identify the strategy almost perfectly, yet 79.2% of the implementations whose specification was read correctly diverge on more than 10% of active bars. The LLM judge of a recent strategy-generation benchmark, applied verbatim, accepts every one of these silent failures.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
Axient: Canonical Protocol-Graph Composition for Leveraged Event Markets: Single State Authority, Atomic Composition, Durable Sagas, and Exactly-Once Recovery
Buying at Support: The Entry Problem under Multi-Skew Brownian Motion
Axient: Manifest-Bound Evidence for On-Chain Financial Protocols: Seven-Layer Derivation, Correlation, Tamper Rejection, and Reproducible Claim Promotion
Latent Continuum of Regimes in Limit Order Book Dynamics
Measuring Trade Direction in a Prediction Market: Settlement Ground Truth and Trading-Cost Measurement on Polymarket
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.