arXiv preprint ·
Asterism: Exploring and Synthesizing Scattered Observations into Literature-Grounded Hypotheses and Theories
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A theory draws many independent observations into one framework with novel hypotheses. A researcher building such a theory must synthesize observations scattered across many papers, each describing related concepts but often in different terms. Which concepts matter most also depends on their preferences and research questions. Recent approaches scale theory synthesis with LLMs, but automate away choices and intuitions from researchers. We present Asterism, which extracts observations from hundreds of papers as concept-relation triples, with concepts unified in a hierarchical ontology. Researchers curate an evidence graph using the ontology and aggregate observations at different levels of granularity to focus theory formation on specific phenomena of interest. In a field deployment (n=10), researchers worked from observations to theories, and kept concepts and hypotheses fitting their preferences. In two case studies, teams of immunology and agriculture researchers discovered mechanisms outside their standard analyses and constructed hypotheses worth follow-up experiments.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
Towards cross-cultural study of folksong lyrics with machine translation
Still funded, no longer counted: how NIH's 2025 award reviews changed what the government counts as minority health research
More Claims, Less Evidence: Bounded Verification of AI-Generated Digital Knowledge Artifacts
TRACE: Target-Aware Retrieval, Attributed Evidence, and Contract-Constrained Extraction for LitTraceQA
Errors of LLM-Assisted Literature Retrieval in Environmental Science: A Comparison Study of Abstract versus Full-text Based Prompts
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.