arXiv preprint ·
Who Asked for This? Inline Annotations as Authoring Transactions for Provenance in Agentic Authoring
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Writing with AI agents turns a paragraph into the outcome of many requests, yet the finished document rarely explains which request produced which change. We introduce Reactant, an interaction paradigm in which authors place typed inline annotations in their original documents. A verified transaction protocol records each request, skill identity, and the correspondences that identify additions, deletions, and transformations. The kernel validates the witness against the recorded states to establish word-level longitudinal lineage. We demonstrate Reactant through this paper's revision history, and report four months of three colleagues' self-directed use. Their uses include conversational inquiry into history and deriving reusable skills from recurring requests, illustrating how the transaction record serves as an extensible substrate for agentic authoring.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
EPIC: Epipolar-Consistent 360° Immersive Stereo Video Generation
ABDA-NL: A Natural-Language Scenario Explorer for Argument-Based Reasoning
Afterglow: A Place-Based Memorial Ecology for AI-Mediated Pet Bereavement
Cybernetic and Epistemic: A Missing Vocabulary for Trustworthy Agentic Delegation
AIfred: Augmented Learning through Functional Robotic Embodiment at the Desk
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.