arXiv preprint ·
Engagement-Led Segmentation of Gamified Participation Data in a Large-Scale Remote Internship: A Mixed-Methods Study
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Gamified points are widely used to represent learner participation, but cumulative point totals provide limited information about how participation changes over time. This limitation matters in continuously enrolling programmes, where learners have different opportunities to accumulate points. This study examines how gamified participation data can be interpreted as indicators of behavioural engagement in a large-scale, continuously enrolling remote internship. Using an anonymised operational dataset, 3,607 distinct started learners were first classified by participation status, separating dormant learners from those with observable participation. The 1,871 active learners were then grouped using K-means clustering on normalised longitudinal and opportunity-aware participation features. Four participation patterns emerged: Thriving Core, Tapering, Fast Starters, and Occasional Participants. Their trajectories differed in both level and direction. A perception survey of 597 respondents provided complementary learner-reported evidence, integrated with the behavioural strand through a joint display by segment. Perceptions differed across segments, while individual-level correlations between perceptions and behaviour were small, and learners with low recorded participation could report positive perceptions of the points system alongside external barriers. Segments assigned from the first four weeks were then checked against eleven weeks of later platform records: 94% of the Thriving Core attended at least ten further sessions and 22% completed the internship, against under 7% and under 1% in the low-engagement segments. The findings suggest that gamified participation data are more informative when interpreted as longitudinal, opportunity-aware behavioural indicators rather than cumulative scores alone.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
Whose Voice Survives the Summary? A Voice-Retention Audit of LLM Employee Listening
AuraForge: Scaling Security Supervision for Training Coding Agents
Characterizing Questioning Patterns and Student Engagement Through Contextual Analysis of Real-Time Classroom Interactions
Correctness, Convergence, and AI-Generated Code Detection: A Longitudinal Study of Student and Large Language Model Code in Introductory Programming
Breaking News Out of the Filter Bubble: Generative AI Search Diversifies Collective Attention and Raises Shared Information Consumption
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.