arXiv preprint ·

Aligning the Incomplete: Joint Distribution Calibration for Multimodal EEG-Eye Emotion Recognition

Yang Wu and Jinpeng Li

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

The success of cross-subject multimodal emotion recognition hinges on maintaining the consistency of the joint data distribution across individuals. However, real-world deployment frequently triggers the \emph{asymmetric joint distribution collapse}: EEG signals suffer from severe cross-subject distribution shifts, while eye movements sensors are susceptible to packet loss and tracking failures. Existing methods treat domain adaptation and missing-modality imputation as disjoint tasks. Consequently, they fail to resolve the compounded errors when both degradations co-occur, either propagating domain shifts through imputed signals or destroying the joint decision boundary. To tackle this unified challenge, we propose GUARD (\textbf{G}radient-guided \textbf{U}nsupervised \textbf{A}symmetric \textbf{R}ecovery of \textbf{D}istributions). First, GUARD establishes a reliable anchor manifold in the source domain by employing a theoretically grounded gradient-weighted objective, which forces the robust EEG modality to preemptively entangle task-discriminative ocular features. Next, to structurally recover the collapsed joint distribution, we constrain a generative module with downstream perceptual losses, prioritizing emotion-discriminative semantics over mere signal fidelity. Finally, we formulate target-domain adaptation as an ill-posed inverse problem. By driving a cycle-consistent flow, we achieve unsupervised calibration of the recovered joint distribution directly on the target-domain manifold. Extensive experiments demonstrate that GUARD significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, maintaining resilient discriminative performance even under complete auxiliary modality failure. Our code and models are made publicly available to ensure complete reproducibility.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Human-Computer Interaction

Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics