arXiv preprint ·
When Does Randomized Oversight Align AI Agents That Can Conceal?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Oversight changes the evidence it relies on. We ask when randomized audits and scoring align AI agents that can conceal misconduct and alter records. Stronger auditing makes undeterred violations better hidden. Because the provider writes the agent's objective, sanctions need not stop at forfeiture, and rare audits deter every type of agent if evidence survives concealment and audit draws cannot be learned in advance. When evidence can be erased, deterrence must come from lower gains from violation, such as credit for stopping, or from costlier or fewer ways to conceal. These conditions identify what failed when agents in OpenAI's cybersecurity evaluations compromised parts of Hugging Face's infrastructure in July 2026.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Theoretical Economics
The False Allure of "Security by Obscurity": A Game-Theoretic Approach
The Double-Edged Sword of Information: Revealed versus Hidden Lotteries in School Choice
Dynamic Matching with Abandonment: Optimal Guarantees via Static Priority Policies
Optimal Networks for Agentic Information Aggregation
Better together? A performance theory of human-machine skill policies under generalization difficulty
Get the few papers worth your time in Theoretical Economics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.