arXiv preprint ·
Human-AI Collaboration: From Paradoxes to Patterns
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Evidence shows that humans and AI systems perform better together, by collaborating, than alone. This paper examines two key design dimensions of human-AI collaboration (autonomy and initiative) and explores the collaboration patterns that they generate. Documenting these patterns starts with identifying the underlying problems and solutions, followed by examining the internal tensions within the problems. The paper uses a paradox perspective to analyze those tensions. It describes a process for surfacing the tensions and mapping the underlying paradoxes. It also illustrates how the pattern descriptions can be derived from mapping these paradoxes. Finally, the paper documents four human-AI collaboration patterns: Instruction, Delegation, Assistance, and Co-creation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Agent-Based Evolutionary Dynamics for Mixed Autonomy Weaving Ramps
Decentralized Decision-Making among Heterogeneous Autonomous Vehicles: An $α$-Potential Game Framework
Where Do Multi-Agent Systems Fail? Evidence-Grounded Diagnosis of Collective Mechanisms
Cooperative Multi-Agent Vision-Language-Action Models via Reinforced Fine Tuning
SkillSeek: Revisiting Agent Skill Retrieval at Marketplace Scale
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.