arXiv preprint ·
Prompted Identity Degrades Cooperation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Multi-agent LLM systems increasingly mix models from several providers, yet exposing each agent's underlying model identity to its peers significantly impairs cooperation. We show that when agents are aware of each other's model family, the group splits into clusters, where agents prefer interacting with others carrying their same label, although nothing in the task rewards or asks for such a split. We argue that the label itself causes this split, which we define as $\textit{factionalism}$. We show and measure this phenomenon in two cooperative games and on a reasoning benchmark, with nine to twenty-five agents drawn from up to five open-weight model families. We further show that when the announced families are shuffled, or replaced by arbitrary labels, the factions still follow this information; when the label is removed, this behavior disappears. In strictly cooperative tasks, labeled groups spend on average $30\%$ more rounds and $55\%$ more tokens to reach a decision, and their success rate drops from $96\%$ to $81\%$. The effect replicates across tasks, group sizes and model families. Withholding identity labels from the agents is simple and effective mitigation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Multiagent Systems
ReplayLens: Auditing Agents' Use of Outcomes
Agent-Based Evolutionary Dynamics for Mixed Autonomy Weaving Ramps
Same Winners, Different Success Rates: Evaluating How LLM Agents Recover from Failures
Human-AI Collaboration: From Paradoxes to Patterns
Emergence, Not Bandwidth: Physical Coupling and the Limits of Learned Multi-Agent Communication
Get the few papers worth your time in Multiagent Systems every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.