arXiv preprint ·
ThinkNet: Compact Architecture Selection and Validation-Gated Ensembles for Subject-Independent MI-EEG Decoding
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Practical assistive and rehabilitative brain--computer interfaces require subject-independent motor-imagery EEG (MI-EEG) decoders that generalize to new users under limited target-user data and constrained compute. However, held-out-subject performance can be overstated when test-subject information influences preprocessing, model selection, or ensemble selection. We present \textit{ThinkNet}, a validation-controlled framework that combines train-only normalization, validation-guided evolutionary search, and validation-gated inference to identify compact decoders and inference policies for held-out subjects. We evaluate four-class BCI Competition IV-2a (session T) decoding with nine Leave-One-Subject-Out (LOSO) folds, three seeds, seven fixed decoder entries, and a broader search over ten representative decoder families; the held-out subject is never used for normalization, hyperparameter, architecture, or ensemble-policy selection. In the fixed benchmark, the validation-selected compact decoder achieved 44.35$\pm$15.41\% accuracy with 4.9K parameters, 19 KB FP32 weights, and 0.99 ms batch-1 Orin CUDA inference. Across the broader search, compact models ($\leq$25K parameters) achieved higher mean held-out accuracy than mid-size and large alternatives after selected retraining (40.10\% vs. 35.09\% and 34.78\%). Validation-gated ensembling improved over validation-selected single-model inference, reaching 43.98$\pm$16.25\% in the fixed benchmark and 43.31$\pm$15.88\% for the compact six-family ensemble. A non-deployable oracle analysis revealed a 6.1-point family-selection gap and near-zero validation--test correlation, showing that validation reliability remains a key bottleneck under subject shift. Thus, ThinkNet is a validation-controlled framework for compact MI-EEG model and inference-policy selection, rather than a single-architecture benchmark.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
Plug-and-Play Methods Provably Converge Even with Improperly Trained Denoisers: Convergence by Architectural Design
Certificate-Governed CRT Sparse FFT: Verified Global-Label Candidate Construction under Explicit Decoding Models
Simulation-Free Learning of GP-SDEs from Irregular Observations
Nonnegative DAG Learning via Concomitant Estimation
ECG-Scroll: A Long-Horizon, Streaming Benchmark and Agent Environment for Interpretation of Ambulatory Electrocardiograms
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.