arXiv preprint ·
What Do Latent Predictive Vehicle Representations Retain? Measuring State, Geometry, and Local Response
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Models of vehicle dynamics learned from logged states and commands complement physics-based models, and latent world models, which predict in a learned representation, are used to plan and train controllers in other domains. Vehicle controllers are usually specified in physical terms: costs, limits, and references depend on position, yaw angle, speed, and yaw rate, and the optimizer compares or differentiates predicted outcomes across nearby commands. A latent model placed in such a controller must therefore let these quantities be recovered and must change its predictions with commands as the vehicle does, and prediction error on its own latent targets measures neither. We contribute a measurement protocol for action-conditioned latent predictors with a physical readout that separately tests retention, physical-neighborhood organization, forecasting, and local response to command perturbations, using an untrained-encoder reference and three matched response paths that locate errors in the representation or the predictor. In a case study of a temporal joint-embedding predictive model trained on signals logged in IPG CarMaker, the representations retain the measured planar outputs, though an untrained encoder of the same architecture retains them slightly better; future-command input improves one-second forecasts with retention nearly unchanged; and responses to small command pulses diverge from the simulator already in latent coordinates, raising regret when choosing among nearby commands in all comparisons. Updating the predictor on responses corrects them locally at a cost in forecast accuracy. Measuring retention, forecasting, and local response separately is thus what qualifies a predictive latent as a candidate model for control, and the protocol provides the basis for its closed-loop evaluation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Robust Game-theoretic Motion Planning over Extended Time Horizons
Notes on Generative Modeling for Feedback Control and Planning
AI Harness: Certification under Proposal-Conditioned Information for Foundation-Model Agents
Feedback Makes Perfect: A Closed-Loop Framework for NL-to-STL Translation
Neural ODEs Meet Concurrent Learning: Stable Online Learning with Lyapunov Guarantees
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.