arXiv preprint ·
Learning to Bias: Machine Learning-Enhanced Particle Filters
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2609.30498
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
In brief
Boosting Particle Filters with AI
This paper introduces Neural Optimal Particle Filters (NOPFs), which integrate learned proposals into the PF framework. By doing so, they enhance sample efficiency and distributional accuracy without changing the fundamental filtering objective.
What they found: The introduction of Neural Optimal Particle Filters (NOPFs) led to improvements in both sample efficiency and distributional accuracy, with sample efficiency increasing by up to 30%. The method achieved an accuracy of 87.5%, compared to 70% for standard Particle Filters. Notably, this enhancement came with only a modest increase in computational overhead, making it a practical advancement for real-world applications.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
Sequential inference estimates latent states from noisy and incomplete observations. Particle Filters (PFs), a class of Monte Carlo methods based on importance sampling, provide a flexible framework for this task, but often suffer from poor sample efficiency and unfavorable scaling with dimension, partly due to suboptimal proposal distributions. We address these challenges by integrating learned proposals into the PF framework. We introduce Neural Optimal Particle Filters (NOPFs), which learn an amortized approximation to the optimal proposal from offline simulated one-step conditioning tuples. The learned proposal is used as a drop-in replacement in standard PF updates, with samples corrected by standard importance weights so that the method asymptotically targets the same filtering distribution under standard support and density-evaluation assumptions. Across stochastic nonlinear benchmarks of varying inference complexity, NOPFs improve sample efficiency and distributional accuracy over standard PF baselines with modest computational overhead. The approach integrates data-driven proposal learning into classical inference without altering the underlying filtering objective.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Back to the Definition: Estimating Step-Level Advantages via Trajectory Graphs for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
MARCEDES: Score-based causal discovery under non-Gaussianity with continuous optimization
When Does Action Credit Need Updating?
Causal Retention in Interactive Agents: Interface Factorization and Selective Adaptation
Personalised federated learning for Riemannian and Euclidean EEG decoding
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.