arXiv preprint ·
Back to the Definition: Estimating Step-Level Advantages via Trajectory Graphs for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Group-based reinforcement learning (RL) methods, such as GRPO and its variants, have become a leading paradigm for training reasoning and agentic large language models (LLMs). While their group-normalized advantage estimation is reliable at the response level, it becomes systematically biased at the step level, since coarse-grained trajectory-level advantages are hard to accurately reflect the contribution of individual steps (i.e, failed trajectories may contain valuable steps). Revisiting the foundational RL definition, we notice that GRPO's success on single-turn tasks stems from its advantage estimation strategy, which adheres to the basic definition: the mean reward of multiple actions sampled from the same state constitutes a credible state-value estimate. Extending the faithful estimation to step-level would in principle demand sampling multiple actions from each intermediate state, which is too costly on a per-state basis. To mitigate this issue, we propose a Graph-based Faithful sTep-level credit-assignment framework (GRAFT) that grafts all rollout trajectories into a trajectory graph, recovering node state-values via Bellman iteration on the graph, and assigning credit to each edge by the node value difference. Theoretically, the estimated step-level advantage faithfully adheres to the basic advantage definition in RL. To further ensure the reliability of step-level advantage estimation, we further propose Graph GAE, which extends GAE to the trajectory graph for reducing the impact of state-value estimation bias. Experiments across a range of multi-turn agentic benchmarks show consistent gains over GRPO and superior performance compared to recent agentic RL algorithms. Code will be available at https://github.com/xcyao00/GRAFT.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
MARCEDES: Score-based causal discovery under non-Gaussianity with continuous optimization
When Does Action Credit Need Updating?
Causal Retention in Interactive Agents: Interface Factorization and Selective Adaptation
Personalised federated learning for Riemannian and Euclidean EEG decoding
Design-Ignoring versus Design-Respecting World Models for Epidemiology
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.