arXiv preprint ·
Design-Ignoring versus Design-Respecting World Models for Epidemiology
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
World models for epidemiology learn from records shaped by study designs, including assignment, sampling, measurement, and related processes. A model may therefore reconstruct observed trajectories while learning an intervention contrast that depends on how records were collected. We formalize study design as constraints on a world model latent-world interface, action mechanism, observation likelihood, and target readout. This distinguishes design-respecting models, which encode these constraints, from design-ignoring models, which fit selected records without relating assignment and observation to the intended intervention question. Using a large scale cluster-randomized test-negative trial, we hold the latent structure and fitting settings fixed and compare a design-ignoring case-count model with a design-respecting test-negative observation model. Both models achieve comparable factual reconstruction. Yet across 500 paired resampling experiments at different relative sampling intensity, median contrast changes are substantial for the design-ignoring model, versus merely marginal for the design-respecting model. The same qualitative separation holds when sampling also varies across clusters. Thus, factual reconstruction alone does not establish design alignment; testing whether fitted contrasts preserve design-implied observation-process invariances provides a sharper evaluation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Methodology
AmbiModBench: Benchmarking Gene Perturbation Prediction Beyond Shared Responses
Missingness-Aware Conformal Prediction Under Cross-Hospital Distribution Shift
Price Stability in the European Union: A Systemic Approach Using Random Matrix Theory
Accounting for Bias Enables Sustainable LLM Evaluation
Reliability Engineering for AI Systems: Challenges, Methods, and Directions
Get the few papers worth your time in Methodology every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.