arXiv preprint ·
A Benchmarking Framework for Context-aware XR Interfaces
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- DOI
- 10.1145/3830398.3830675
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Everyday Extended Reality (XR) systems aim to provide context-aware access to the right functionalities at the right time and place, with minimal manual reconfiguration as users switch context. Yet these interfaces are hard to evaluate: current prototyping and user-study workflows offer no systematic, repeatable way to compare adaptation methods across users and scenarios. We present ContextXR, a novel benchmarking framework for context-aware XR interfaces. ContextXR represents an XR application as a connected graph of functional facets, each a semantically coherent group of related capabilities that together support a shared user intent. On this representation, we build MineXR++, a dataset augmenting prior XR interface data with facet-level annotations, and formulate three canonical tasks of context-aware suggestion: context factor analysis, initial facet suggestion, and next facet suggestion. Our evaluation protocol scores suggestion methods by a simulated interaction metric, the navigation and search cost of reaching the desired functionality. Through experiments benchmarking global popularity, relational retrieval, and LLM-based methods, we demonstrate that ContextXR enables the systematic, reproducible evaluation of context-aware XR interfaces.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
A Procedure for Classifying Attachments and Affective Social Bonds in Human-Robot Dyads
Multi-Objective Human-in-the-Loop Bayesian Optimization of a Lower-Limb Exoskeleton
AI-Moderated Interviews for Market Research and Digital Twins Calibration
Beyond the Last Truffula Tree: SustainAI - A Water-Aware, Closed-Loop Framework for Environmentally Accountable AI
DocuTeam: Mixed-Initiative Multi-Agent Discussions around Evolving Documents
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.