arXiv preprint ·
Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification for fMRI Functional Connectivity via Simulation-Based Inference
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Optimizing fMRI scan duration and spatial resolution is critical for experimental design, yet traditional correlation-based approaches cannot quantify uncertainty or disentangle scanner measurement noise from true neural variability across subjects. Without principled uncertainty bounds, researchers cannot know whether a protocol is long enough to reliably estimate connectivity, or whether between-subject differences reflect biological variation or noise. We present a Bayesian framework modeling BOLD dynamics as coupled Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes, using Sequential Neural Posterior Estimation to obtain connectivity posteriors while accounting for frequency-independent measurement noise across the BOLD spectrum. Applied to N = 28 healthy controls (55 scans) at 7T using a functional network atlas (65 DMN regions), the framework quantifies uncertainty across its sources: scanner noise, subject variability, and acquisition length. Spatial analysis identifies a mean of 46 voxels per ROI, roughly half of typical region sizes, as sufficient to achieve 90% of asymptotic precision. At the single-subject level, 7T reaches its within-session precision plateau in approximately 7 minutes versus 10 minutes for 3T, a 40% reduction in required scan time, providing the first direct, model-based quantification of the scan-time advantage conferred by higher field strength. At the population level, 3T requires roughly 37 times more per-subject scan time than 7T for the pooled curves to converge, confirming a consistent advantage of higher field strength at every timescale. Together these findings provide concrete, scanner-specific guidance for protocol optimization, with direct implications for reducing acquisition costs and improving the reliability of connectivity-based clinical biomarkers. We provide code enabling researchers to derive these bounds from their own data.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning (Statistics)
Back to the Definition: Estimating Step-Level Advantages via Trajectory Graphs for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
MARCEDES: Score-based causal discovery under non-Gaussianity with continuous optimization
When Does Action Credit Need Updating?
Causal Retention in Interactive Agents: Interface Factorization and Selective Adaptation
Personalised federated learning for Riemannian and Euclidean EEG decoding
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning (Statistics) every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.