arXiv preprint ·
"We'll Fix It Later": Education, AI, and the Deferral of Privacy in EdTech
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Educational technology (EdTech) platforms collect highly sensitive student data, including behavioral logs, disability records, and academic histories. However, privacy considerations are often postponed rather than treated as a foundational design requirement. We present a mixed-methods study combining 12 semi-structured interviews with EdTech professionals and a privacy policy audit of 48 platforms coded across five dimensions, with strong inter-rater reliability (mean Cohen's Kappa = 0.781). Our interviews reveal a recurring organizational pattern in which privacy is recognized as important but deferred across the product lifecycle as organizations prioritize product functionality, growth, funding, and immediate educational outcomes. Responsibility is often delegated to cloud providers, policy documents, or downstream institutions, while limited privacy-related feedback gives organizations little pressure to change these practices. The policy analysis reflects these patterns: platforms describe what data they collect relatively well but provide substantially less information about how that data is subsequently governed. Thirty-three percent make no meaningful Artificial Intelligence (AI) disclosure despite visible AI features, and 73% provide only generic accountability and breach-response language. K-12 platforms perform better on children's consent where regulation creates explicit requirements, but this advantage does not extend to AI governance or accountability. These findings suggest that meaningful improvement requires enforceable institutional and regulatory mechanisms rather than voluntary privacy commitments alone.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
Who Acts, Who Knows, Who Answers? A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis of Agency, Epistemic Responsibility, and Accountability in Generative AI Higher Education Research
Fast Frame Rate Estimation in Electromagnetic Side-Channel Attacks on Public Systems
What fidelity metrics miss: a structural check on synthetic educational data
Digital Medicines Information at National Scale: Search Behaviour and System Performance of MediVerify Across 1.5 Million Queries
Understanding Human Perception of Representation in Citizens' Assemblies: An Empirical Study
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.