arXiv preprint ·
Who Acts, Who Knows, Who Answers? A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis of Agency, Epistemic Responsibility, and Accountability in Generative AI Higher Education Research
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly described in higher education as a tool, collaborator, evaluator, proxy, and infrastructure. These labels are not neutral: they shape who is seen as acting, knowing, and, crucially, being answerable when someone uses AI. This study examines how scholars distribute such responsibility across 366 English-language titles and abstracts published between November 2022 and 14 August 2026. A corpus-assisted discourse analysis combined frequency counts, five-word collocations, actor-predicate associations, obligation-clause coding, and heuristic analysis of passives, nominalisations, and reporting metonymies. The final corpus contained 91,405 tokens, drawn from 8,734 unique records screened after deduplication. AI was the most frequently named actor, appearing 2,050 times and entering 447 predicate associations, most involving action. Students, by contrast, were more often associated with knowing, judging, and verifying, yet no sentence ever made AI explicitly responsible. Responsibility fell largely on educators, institutions, and policy, or disappeared through passive and nominalised constructions. Even frequent phrases such as "responsible AI" and "responsible use" rarely identify who is accountable for what. The findings reveal a persistent gap between giving AI functional agency and assigning normative accountability.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
Fast Frame Rate Estimation in Electromagnetic Side-Channel Attacks on Public Systems
What fidelity metrics miss: a structural check on synthetic educational data
Digital Medicines Information at National Scale: Search Behaviour and System Performance of MediVerify Across 1.5 Million Queries
Understanding Human Perception of Representation in Citizens' Assemblies: An Empirical Study
AI-Moderated Interviews for Market Research and Digital Twins Calibration
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.