arXiv preprint ·
Watching What We Eat: Information Quality and Body Image in Diet-Related YouTube Videos
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- DOI
- 10.1145/3794786.3830741
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The widespread use of social media, particularly image- and video-based platforms, has turned them into key sources of both normative and informational content related to health and diet. This may contribute to the development of disordered eating behaviors or, potentially, eating disorders. This study uses mixed-methods analysis applied to 3129 YouTube videos about diet and weight loss in order to quantify the level of risk of low-quality information and heightened focus on the body image. We adapt three quality measurement frameworks from the literature -- PRHISM, HONcode and SMEC -- to the online video context, perform manual annotation of a sample of the data, and design an LLM content characterization pipeline to score the videos on the quality of their content and the focus on the human body. Surprisingly, we find that videos around personal storytelling and mindset & motivation are associated with higher-quality content, whereas supplement reviews (arguably more medically sensitive ones) are not. Further, the body-related mentions of weight measurement and negative body image are associated with an increased viewership, whereas the mentions of positive body image are associated with an increased engagement rate in terms of likes and comments, but not viewership. Worryingly, we find a cluster of videos categorized as "music" which promote the dietary supplements Mitolyn and the injectable weight loss drug Mounjaro. As video-based platforms grow in popularity, particularly among younger audiences, studies such as the one presented here are essential for developing empirically grounded tools to enhance the detection of harmful content and inform more effective moderation practices.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
Who Acts, Who Knows, Who Answers? A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis of Agency, Epistemic Responsibility, and Accountability in Generative AI Higher Education Research
Fast Frame Rate Estimation in Electromagnetic Side-Channel Attacks on Public Systems
What fidelity metrics miss: a structural check on synthetic educational data
Digital Medicines Information at National Scale: Search Behaviour and System Performance of MediVerify Across 1.5 Million Queries
Understanding Human Perception of Representation in Citizens' Assemblies: An Empirical Study
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.