arXiv preprint ·
TimeLitmus: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Cross-Modal Understanding and Explanation Faithfulness in Event-Conditioned Time-Series Prediction
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to make predictions from numerical time-series histories and textual events. Yet accuracy alone cannot reveal whether correct answers reflect effective integration of the two inputs or instead arise from event polarity, unimodal priors, or superficial cues. Likewise, plausible explanations may rationalize predictions without faithfully reflecting the evidence that drives model behavior. We introduce TimeLitmus, a diagnostic benchmark for cross-modal understanding and explanation faithfulness in event-conditioned time-series prediction. TimeLitmus contains 4,856 evaluation records across Finance and Traffic, combining natural prediction with controlled counterfactual and contrastive interventions, explanation-targeted faithfulness tests, and systematic shortcut controls. Across ten representative LLMs, standard prediction accuracy substantially overstates reliable cross-modal understanding: Hard Paired Contrast (HPC) pair correctness peaks at only 19.2% in Finance and 11.7% in Traffic, and all ten models show lower-than-expected consistency on Finance series-side controls. Models often recognize scenario relations explicitly yet fail to apply them during independent prediction. Explanation faithfulness shows a similar gap: in Traffic, most models cite the manipulated temporal factor in over 90% of cases, while behavioral support remains below 22%. Human annotators outperform LLMs on matched controlled and hard-pair diagnostics, confirming that these distinctions are recoverable from the inputs. Natural-only adaptation yields selective gains in evidence selection and input sensitivity, but not consistent gains in controlled or hard-pair behavior. The benchmark, evaluation suite, and supervised adaptation data will be released publicly.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Djinnlang: Higher-Level Programming by Unambiguous Specification with an LLM in the Compiler
SMTB: Fast Structure-Mapping with Tight Bounds
Divergent strategies and convergent outcomes in autonomous materials discovery
Hill Sampling for Test-Time Scaling: A Simple and Better Alternative to Repeated Sampling, Evolution, and Training
UniK: Universal Knowledge Perception for Digital and Physical AI
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.