arXiv preprint ·
Divergent strategies and convergent outcomes in autonomous materials discovery
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Scientific agents are mostly evaluated on whether they complete tasks or recover known results; we instead study variation across repeated open-ended campaigns. Sixteen separately initialized sessions of one model-harness configuration received a frozen database of 12,499 metal-organic frameworks, a methane-storage objective, a pinned protocol and a one-week budget. Strategies diverged into four approaches spanning 100--5,000 screened structures, and eight built 2,253 hypothetical structures. Yet the agents recovered the same materials frontier near 200 cm^3/cm^3, and an independent calculation of the database's porous region found its nine best structures all among their reports. Enforced checks on half the agents raised fresh-run reproduction from one of eight to eight of eight but could not detectably improve conclusion validity, because fifteen of sixteen agents selected the same audit-excluded entry, an incomplete structure whose missing anions created artificial pore volume. Replicated agents thus reveal both robust conclusions and common-mode errors from shared inputs.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Real-Time Atomic-Resolution Electron Phase Imaging without Probe Calibration via Ptychography-Supervised Learning
Electronic-Entropy-Driven Phase Transitions in Compressed Iron Oxides
Deep Generative Crystal Structure Prediction: A Benchmark Study and a Controlled Test of Prototype Dependence
Vacancy aggregation enhances NV- spin coherence in diamond: a cluster-correlation-expansion study of multi-vacancy spin baths in semiconductors
Topology-Stratified Materials Discovery with A Flow-Based Generative Model
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.