arXiv preprint ·
Misaligned Clinical Risk Classification and Cost Asymmetry in Open-Weight Large Language Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
How large language models (LLMs) integrate patient risk with clinical cost tradeoffs remains poorly understood. We investigated how four open-weight LLMs (Qwen-2.5-7B/32B and Llama-3.1-8B/70B) internally represent cost tradeoffs, how these representations relate to clinical predictions, and whether decisions shift as predicted by the specified cost direction and magnitude. Using a public diabetes dataset, we varied 11 false-negative (FN) to false-positive (FP) cost ratios across three phrasings and examined representations and behavioral outputs. Patient risk was linearly recoverable on par with conventional classifiers (AUC $\approx 0.83$), and cost direction was recoverable in every model. However, representational shifts in cost direction tracked output changes only in the two larger models, and responses to cost magnitude were predominantly direction-agnostic. Only 2 of 12 model-phrasings showed both opposing responses to increasing FN versus FP costs and cost-correct ordering. Representationally, a direction fitted on one cost side did not invert when transferred to the other, as expected under mirror-symmetric encoding. These findings suggest that LLMs encode risk and cost information but do not reliably integrate them into cost-correct decisions. Clinical evaluations should therefore include tradeoff tests, phrasing sensitivity, and default operating points alongside predictive performance.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Djinnlang: Higher-Level Programming by Unambiguous Specification with an LLM in the Compiler
SMTB: Fast Structure-Mapping with Tight Bounds
Divergent strategies and convergent outcomes in autonomous materials discovery
Hill Sampling for Test-Time Scaling: A Simple and Better Alternative to Repeated Sampling, Evolution, and Training
UniK: Universal Knowledge Perception for Digital and Physical AI
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.