arXiv preprint ·
R-GEAN: Regimen-Guided Edit Action Network for Within-Admission Medication Change Prediction
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The medications prescribed to a patient often change during a hospital admission as clinicians start, stop, or continue therapies. We study whether models can predict which medication classes are added or removed between 24 hours after admission and discharge. Metrics that compare the complete discharge regimen can reward models for copying medications that remain unchanged, even when they identify no actual changes. We therefore introduce a leakage-controlled benchmark that predicts net ATC3 additions and removals using only prior completed admissions and information available within the first 24 hours of the current admission. Addition candidates are classes not active at 24 hours, whereas removal candidates are classes active at that time. We also introduce R-GEAN, an asymmetric candidate-scoring network with independent addition and removal predictors. Across 240,480 admissions from 82,286 patients, R-GEAN achieves the highest predefined summary of addition, removal, changed-regimen, and action-pattern performance, termed the edit composite (0.464), compared with 0.435 for the strongest primary comparator. Reimplemented RETAIN, GAMENet, and MICRON baselines obtain 0.428, 0.420, and 0.288, respectively. R-GEAN's advantage is concentrated in correctly identifying medication classes no longer active at discharge, while rare additions and admissions with multiple medication changes remain difficult. Rankings based on micro-F1 over the reconstructed discharge regimen and the edit composite correlate weakly across the evaluated models (Spearman r = 0.20). The continuation baseline achieves the highest complete-regimen score despite predicting no additions or removals. These results show that complete-regimen and edit-level evaluation measure different aspects of medication prediction. The benchmark evaluates observed prescribing changes, not treatment appropriateness
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Scoring With the Engine: Retrieval Exposure, Cross-Engine Divergence, and the Limits of Engine-Agnostic GEO Scores
Semantic Candidate-Job Matching: A Comparative Evaluation of Dense Embedding Models in Hybrid Retrieval
DOA-SORT: Directional Occlusion-Aware Multi-Object Tracking with Distributional Observations
From Ranked Documents to Reliable Contexts: An Answer-Oriented Context Construct Framework for AI Search
Beyond Raw Engagement: A Counterfactual Observability Framework for Recommender Systems at Netflix
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.