arXiv preprint ·
Semantic Candidate-Job Matching: A Comparative Evaluation of Dense Embedding Models in Hybrid Retrieval
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative evaluation of dense embedding models for semantic candidate-job matching in high-volume staffing workflows. Incoming job descriptions are converted into structured English search text and language-specific keywords through LLM-based parsing, and candidate profiles are indexed as semantically enriched resume representations. We evaluate EmbeddingGemma (base) against EmbeddingGemma fine-tuned with Cached Multiple Negatives Ranking Loss (MNRL) within a unified hybrid retrieval pipeline that fuses vector similarity and full-text relevance via reciprocal rank fusion (RRF), and benchmark both against the MPNet model on a batch comparative evaluation dataset scored through the deployed job-candidate matching scoring pipeline. We further document, with mathematical detail, the broader set of contrastive fine-tuning objectives considered during model development (including AnglE/CoSENT-style refinement) and the empirical rationale for retaining Cached-MNRL-only adaptation as the preferred configuration. To support reproducible model selection, we define a broader evaluation framework comprising standard information retrieval metrics (Recall@K, mean reciprocal rank, nDCG) under the exact hybrid-retrieval protocol; the metrics used for the evaluation reported in this paper are fine-tuning convergence diagnostics and a batch comparative evaluation using the deployed AI-Match score and an independent LLM-as-a-Judge relevance score, and we state this scope explicitly rather than implying the full framework was measured. The paper addresses the gap between general-purpose embedding benchmarks and enterprise job-candidate matching constraints, providing a structured basis for comparing embedding strategies under realistic job-candidate retrieval conditions.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Retrieval
UniK: Universal Knowledge Perception for Digital and Physical AI
From Ranked Documents to Reliable Contexts: An Answer-Oriented Context Construct Framework for AI Search
When More Evidence Hurts: Publication-Bias Drift and Principled Stopping for Biomedical Causal Search
PSD: Pseudo Self-Distillation of Memory Representation Capabilities for LLM Agents
Graded-Relevance Composed Multimodal Retrieval for E-commerce Visual Search at Scale
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.