arXiv preprint ·
The Ups and Downs of Backprop Weights
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Backpropagation (BP) has driven the remarkable success of modern deep learning by enabling large hierarchical networks to learn complex functions end-to-end. Yet it does not by itself determine how parameters should be organized so that functional components can be reused and adapted selectively. For example, object recognition and motion prediction may depend on overlapping parameter sets, making them difficult to isolate or modify independently. We call this condition weight entanglement. Modern architectures dynamically select which parts of a network process each sample: nonlinearities gate units, attention selects interactions, and Mixture-of-Experts architectures route inputs to modules. Yet such selection does not ensure that the same functional component remains linked to an identifiable parameter set across samples. We propose weight operators: parameterized modules that implement reusable functional components and can be composed at inference to form the function required by each sample. Learning proceeds in two stages: the model first infers the required operator composition, then updates only the selected operators' parameter sets. Vector Networks (VNs) provide one implementation. They couple operator selection to local error-driven updates within each layer and show that learned operators can be reused in combinations absent from training while updates remain restricted to the selected parameter sets. This provides a basis for testing functional parameter identifiability: whether an operator remains linked to the same functional component during learning. We argue that functional parameter identifiability may provide an organizing principle for models that systematically reuse and recombine learned functions while adapting only the components that need to change.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
SpecOpt: Contact-Diff Reasoning for Agentic Molecule Optimization Toward Binding Specificity
From Capability to Assurance in Autonomous Penetration-Testing Harnesses: A Framework and Reference Implementation
Implicit Rule Induction with Test-Time Task Embeddings in ARC-like Tasks
Self-Organizing Agent Teams Learn to Reason Together
SWE-Proof: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World Issues with Machine-Checked Proofs?
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.