arXiv preprint ·
Implicit Rule Induction with Test-Time Task Embeddings in ARC-like Tasks
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus and related benchmarks evaluate whether AI models can solve novel reasoning tasks, but often leave unclear whether success reflects inference of the intended underlying rule or reliance on shortcuts. We address this gap by studying test-time task embeddings in Vision ARC (VARC), a model in which a pre-trained backbone is complemented by a trainable embedding representing the transformation rule. In the original VARC, test-time training (TTT) is jointly applied to the backbone and task embedding. Here we introduce a novel two-step TTT protocol: first finetune only the task embedding (Embed-TTT), then freeze it and finetune the backbone. Across ARC-AGI-1, ConceptARC, and two controlled datasets with known rules, Embed-TTT consistently yields improved task embeddings, ones that align better with underlying task rules, improve embedding-based retrieval, and enable accurate linear probing of known rules. Qualitatively, Embed-TTT identifies more semantically meaningful relations between test and train tasks on ARC-AGI-1. We also show that optimizing only task embeddings (less than 0.01% of model parameters) already solves a non-trivial fraction of ARC-AGI-1, ConceptARC, and Mini-ARC tasks, while the full two-step pipeline improves final performance. Finally, we show that Embed-TTT recovers the underlying geometric structure of parametric rules and learns compositional capabilities that enable rule-wise interpolation, but not extrapolation. These findings support a clearer separation between rule induction and rule execution in ARC-like evaluations, motivating benchmarks that better distinguish in-distribution from out-of-distribution rules.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
SpecOpt: Contact-Diff Reasoning for Agentic Molecule Optimization Toward Binding Specificity
From Capability to Assurance in Autonomous Penetration-Testing Harnesses: A Framework and Reference Implementation
Self-Organizing Agent Teams Learn to Reason Together
SWE-Proof: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World Issues with Machine-Checked Proofs?
Vision2CAD: A Visual Agent Harness for Explicit Geometry Referencing and Localization in Parametric CAD Modeling
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.