arXiv preprint ·
Assessment of Machine Learning-Based Critical Heat Flux Models in the CTF Subchannel Code for Square Rod Bundle Prediction
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2609.21995
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
In brief
Revolutionizing Nuclear Safety Predictions
This paper evaluates machine learning-based CHF models within the CTF subchannel code, using a comprehensive rod bundle database. The results show that these models not only transfer well from tube to rod bundle applications but also significantly outperform traditional methods.
What they found: The study reveals that machine learning models can significantly enhance CHF predictions in rod bundles, outperforming traditional empirical methods. The local hybrid LUT model achieved the strongest performance, while the semilocal pure ML model also demonstrated high competitiveness. These findings suggest that even models trained on tube data can be effectively applied to more complex geometries, marking a promising advancement in reactor thermal hydraulic analysis.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
The prediction of critical heat flux (CHF), a key safety-related quantity in nuclear thermal hydraulics, remains an important challenge due to its direct relationship with fuel performance and reactor safety. Recent studies have demonstrated that relative to traditional empirical correlations and lookup tables (LUTs), machine learning (ML) methods can substantially improve CHF prediction accuracy. Most ML-based CHF models, however, have been developed and evaluated using tube databases, leaving their applicability to reactor-relevant rod bundle geometries largely unexplored. This study evaluates ML-based CHF models deployed within the CTF subchannel code using the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) rod bundle CHF database. Both pure and hybrid residual correction models are considered in local and semilocal formulations. The tube-trained ML CHF models generally transferred favorably to rod bundle applications and outperformed traditional CHF methods across most geometries and operating conditions. The local hybrid LUT model produced the strongest overall performance, and the semilocal pure ML model remained highly competitive. Comparison against the Bowring correlation, W-3 correlation, and 2006 Groeneveld LUT demonstrated that substantial improvements in rod bundle CHF prediction are possible even when models are trained exclusively on tube data. These findings provide one of the first large-scale assessments of ML-based CHF models in square rod bundles within a production-level subchannel analysis environment and support their broader application in reactor thermal hydraulic analysis.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
M2G-LLM: Enhancing Clinical Prediction via Multimodal Graph Reasoning and LLM Context Injection
SPIBER: Reconstructing Free Energy Landscapes from Short, Unconverged Trajectories with Generative Flow Networks
TierKV: Long-Context On-Device LLMs via Predictive Multi-Tier KV Caching
Mask-Aware Execution for Efficient JEPA Training
Implicit Rule Induction with Test-Time Task Embeddings in ARC-like Tasks
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.