arXiv preprint ·
Refuse, Decompose, Refresh: A Claim-Safe Protocol for Closed-Loop AI Evaluation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
An AI evaluation can be perfectly reproducible and still support the wrong claim. This risk is acute in closed-loop systems: policy determines visited states, observable components, and which failures leave a measurable trace. We propose a claim-safe protocol with three actions. Refuse: abstain when a clean reference stream or matched runtime comparison lacks support. Decompose: report protocol execution, operational false admission, and structural hypotheses separately rather than as one PASS/FAIL label. Refresh: treat distribution-shift alarms as requests to invalidate and recompute a reference map, not as fault evidence. We instantiate the protocol in an aggregate-only simulator with 24 policy components, three demand regimes, two fault-mask families, and independent development and heldout seeds. The preregistered heldout contains 1,440 cases and 21,600 partition rows. Only 55/72 regime-component units were reference-admitted and 54/55 remained runtime-admitted, making abstention part of the result. Stable false admission was 0/20 represented components, with a one-sided exact 95% upper bound of 0.1391 under a frozen 0.20 rule. Within admitted units, affected clean traffic outpredicted nominal fault-cell fraction: across 540 unit-arm rows nested in 20 component clusters, the cell-minus-traffic negative-log-likelihood difference was 0.1264 nats per row, with a 95% component-cluster interval of [0.0593, 0.1918]. A drift log shows why "null" must be reference-relative: clean fault-null streams triggered 15/15, 0/15, and 14/15 alarms across three regimes, while only the middle regime matched the frozen detector reference. Rather than a universal threshold, we contribute an executable contract linking observable support, statistical calibration, and justified claims.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
CoreSense: Traceable Failure Recall and Conflict-Aware Belief Gating for Auditable Robot Decisions
SpecOpt: Contact-Diff Reasoning for Agentic Molecule Optimization Toward Binding Specificity
QVAC Genesis III: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Open Synthetic STEM Corpus for Efficient Language Model Pre-Training
Implicit Rule Induction with Test-Time Task Embeddings in ARC-like Tasks
LLM-as-an-Improver: Turning Verification into Better Candidates
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.