arXiv preprint ·

''Bless his heart... he thought all we did was push a button": Understanding Worker Challenges with U.S. Election Technology

Delaney Gomen, Josiah Hester, Naveena Karusala and Michael Specter

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Human-Computer InteractionComputers & Society

Abstract

This paper explores how the technologies U.S. election officials depend on also challenge their work. Every election, misleading narratives stem from errors that occur while using election technology, threatening election official safety and eroding faith in elections. We seek to understand the impact of these challenges directly from worker perspectives. This paper presents a qualitative analysis using combined interview and survey data from a total of 50 election officials representing 20 states. Our findings present design as a substantial factor in mistakes when using election technology, but other obstacles, like lack of funding and technical support, also strain operations. We show how election technology design can lead to harms for election officials and connect those harms to their negative effects on democracy. Our work emphasizes the potential for researchers in human-centered computing to support U.S. election officials-and democracy-by working towards better usability across election technologies.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Human-Computer Interaction

Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics