arXiv preprint ·
Examining the Difference in Human Behavior Between Virtual and Real-World Human-Robot Teaming
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Prototyping and evaluating human-robot teaming (HRT) scenarios in the real-world is costly. Virtual simulation of HRT scenarios has been adopted as an alternative to conducting user studies in the real-world to investigate user perceptions, behaviors, and performance during human-robot interactions. The consistency of human behavior between the real and virtual-worlds is integral to the validity of utilizing such virtual experimentation. This paper presents a user study examining the difference in human behavior between an HRT scenario conducted in a virtual vs real environment. We employed mixed-methods to examine team performance and human factors during the HRT. Our quantitative results showed a significant difference in workload between the two modalities. Our qualitative analysis expanded on the quantitative results and found differences in participants' strategy, their mental model of robots, and the type of trust they had for robots between modalities.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Robotics
A11yLTLNav: Automatic Detection of Accessibility Navigation Failures
Value Faces: Surfacing How Self-Presentation Shifts Across Relationships
Measuring AI Leadership: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure for AI-Native Organizations
Full-Duplex Speech Models Take the Floor When Asked, Not When Needed
Gaze as Evidence for Common Grounding: A Cross-Corpus Analysis of MapTask and MUNDEX
Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.